Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
EP795 Searching for the best maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors? A network meta-analysis
by
Poletto, E
, Andreotti, V
, Lombardi, D
, Nicoloso, M
, Bartoletti, M
, Parnofiello, A
, Bozza, C
, Scalone, S
, Bortot, L
, Vitale, MG
, Puglisi, F
, Sorio, R
, Pelizzari, G
, Sacco, C
, Andreetta, C
, Giavarra, M
in
Cancer therapies
/ Meta-analysis
/ Monoclonal antibodies
/ Ovarian cancer
/ Targeted cancer therapy
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
EP795 Searching for the best maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors? A network meta-analysis
by
Poletto, E
, Andreotti, V
, Lombardi, D
, Nicoloso, M
, Bartoletti, M
, Parnofiello, A
, Bozza, C
, Scalone, S
, Bortot, L
, Vitale, MG
, Puglisi, F
, Sorio, R
, Pelizzari, G
, Sacco, C
, Andreetta, C
, Giavarra, M
in
Cancer therapies
/ Meta-analysis
/ Monoclonal antibodies
/ Ovarian cancer
/ Targeted cancer therapy
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
EP795 Searching for the best maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors? A network meta-analysis
by
Poletto, E
, Andreotti, V
, Lombardi, D
, Nicoloso, M
, Bartoletti, M
, Parnofiello, A
, Bozza, C
, Scalone, S
, Bortot, L
, Vitale, MG
, Puglisi, F
, Sorio, R
, Pelizzari, G
, Sacco, C
, Andreetta, C
, Giavarra, M
in
Cancer therapies
/ Meta-analysis
/ Monoclonal antibodies
/ Ovarian cancer
/ Targeted cancer therapy
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
EP795 Searching for the best maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors? A network meta-analysis
Journal Article
EP795 Searching for the best maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: bevacizumab or PARP-inhibitors? A network meta-analysis
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction/BackgroundPatients (pts) with ovarian cancer experiencing a platinum-sensitive (PS) recurrence are generally re-exposed to platinum agents (PCT). The addition of bevacizumab (BEV) or PARP inhibitors (PARPi) as concomitant and/or maintenance therapy has shown to improve progression free survival (PFS). In the absence of direct comparisons coming from randomized trials (RCTs), we have performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate differences in terms of efficacy between BEV and PARPi in pts with PS recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC), according to BRCA status.MethodologyWe searched PubMed, Embase and Medline for RCTs involving pts with PS rOC treated with BEV (n=3, 1563 pts) or PARPi (n=5, 1839 pts). Only trials with PFS as primary endpoint were included. Analyses have been done pooling pts who had received PARPi in three groups, according to the available data on BRCA genes status: all comers (AC), BRCA mutated pts (BRCAm) and BRCA wild-type pts (BRCAwt). A frequentist approach has been used with R statistical software. To rank the effect size of treatments, surface under the cumulative ranking value (SUCRA) has been applied.ResultsIn AC pts, PARPi improved PFS compared to BEV (hazard ratio [HR]=0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.91). In BRCAm pts the gain in PFS for PARPi was even higher compared to BEV (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36–0.59). In BRCAwt pts the benefit of PARPi over BEV was not statistically significant (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.20) but PARPi had the highest likelihood of being ranked as the best treatment in terms of efficacy according to SUCRA (90% and 60%, respectively for PARPi and BEV).ConclusionAccording to indirect comparisons, PARPi performed the best for the treatment of PS rOC, especially in BRCAm pts who had not previously received PARPi. BEV could be still an option in BRCAwt pts.DisclosureFabio Puglisi: Roche, AstraZeneca (honoraria and research founding). No conflict of interest is to be declared for the remaining authors. The authors receive no financial support for this study.
Publisher
Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.