Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
When a study doesn’t show what you hoped for
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
When a study doesn’t show what you hoped for
Do you wish to request the book?
When a study doesn’t show what you hoped for
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
When a study doesn’t show what you hoped for
2022
Overview
One of the arguments often made for eliminating (or at least reducing) the length of time admitted patients spend in the ED waiting for an inpatient bed is that these ‘boarded’ patients are likely, among other undesirable outcomes, to have longer hospital lengths of stay. Longer lengths of stay mean fewer patients coming in and out, and this can threaten bottom lines, waiting lists, and targets. [...]one may read the article by Lane and colleagues1 with high hopes for additional evidence on the harms of boarding psychiatric patients. Lane et al allude to this in their discussion pointing out that ‘The small absolute effect may be a positive sign of the resilience of healthcare providers finding ways to initiate treatment for patients with acute psychiatric illnesses whey they are boarded in the ED.’
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine,BMJ Publishing Group LTD
