Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Habitat Structure Influences Refuge Use by Two Sympatric Species of Neotropical Forest Rodents
by
Bretscher, Andrew
, Adler, Gregory H.
, Lambert, Thomas D.
, Dittel, Jacob W.
in
age structure
/ armored rat
/ canopy
/ discriminant analysis
/ Echimyidae
/ Feature Articles
/ Hoplomys gymnurus
/ interspecific competition
/ microhabitats
/ Panama
/ Proechimys semispinosus
/ rain forests
/ refuge habitats
/ rodents
/ spiny rat
/ sympatry
/ tropical forests
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Habitat Structure Influences Refuge Use by Two Sympatric Species of Neotropical Forest Rodents
by
Bretscher, Andrew
, Adler, Gregory H.
, Lambert, Thomas D.
, Dittel, Jacob W.
in
age structure
/ armored rat
/ canopy
/ discriminant analysis
/ Echimyidae
/ Feature Articles
/ Hoplomys gymnurus
/ interspecific competition
/ microhabitats
/ Panama
/ Proechimys semispinosus
/ rain forests
/ refuge habitats
/ rodents
/ spiny rat
/ sympatry
/ tropical forests
2018
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Habitat Structure Influences Refuge Use by Two Sympatric Species of Neotropical Forest Rodents
by
Bretscher, Andrew
, Adler, Gregory H.
, Lambert, Thomas D.
, Dittel, Jacob W.
in
age structure
/ armored rat
/ canopy
/ discriminant analysis
/ Echimyidae
/ Feature Articles
/ Hoplomys gymnurus
/ interspecific competition
/ microhabitats
/ Panama
/ Proechimys semispinosus
/ rain forests
/ refuge habitats
/ rodents
/ spiny rat
/ sympatry
/ tropical forests
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Habitat Structure Influences Refuge Use by Two Sympatric Species of Neotropical Forest Rodents
Journal Article
Habitat Structure Influences Refuge Use by Two Sympatric Species of Neotropical Forest Rodents
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Terrestrial echimyid rodents typically use subterranean cavities and hollow logs as refuges. We examined habitat characteristics at refuges used by 2 such species of rodents, Proechimys semispinosus and Hoplomys gymnurus, to better understand coexistence of these morphologically similar sympatric species. The study was performed in a lowland moist forest in central Panama from 2009 to 2013. Sewing-bobbin tracking was used to locate refuges. We examined refuge habitat at 2 scales. At a coarser scale (microhabitat), we measured 10 variables within a 5-m radius around each refuge site and an associated random point, which represented available habitat. At a finer scale (refuge entrance), we measured 11 variables within a radius of 0.5 m centered on each refuge and an associated random point. We used discriminant function analysis to search for differences between refuge and available habitats at both scales and for both species separately. We located 70 refuges of both species. Refuges used by P. semispinosus were positively associated with litter depth, canopy openness, numbers and sizes of nearby logs, and proximity to tree-fall gaps, which all indicate forest disturbances. Hoplomys gymnurus refuges did not show any differences from available habitat. Lastly, we found no differences in refuge use between the sexes or age classes for either species. We conclude that interspecific competition for refuges is generally unlikely to be important because small-scale differences in refuge habitats facilitate coexistence.
Publisher
American Society of Mammalogists,Oxford University Press
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.