MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”
Journal Article

A Methodology for a Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Concepts “Shaman” and “Shamanism”

2011
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Scholars routinely confront the problem of translating concepts from one cognitivelinguistic system to another. The concepts \"shaman\" and \"shamanism,\" which are employed particularly in comparative religious and anthropological studies, are a case in point. Scholars from various academic disciplines make use of different, indistinct, and indeed contradictory definitions of these terms. As a result, their content and meaning have been obscured. My aim in this article is to emphasize the importance of establishing comparative religious concepts as methodical research tools. In particular, I call attention to the need to distinguish between emic (indigenous) concepts and etic (constructed by the scholar) comparative \"ideal types\" (Max Weber) in cultural and religious studies. Through the methodology of constructing theoretical analytical notions advocated in this essay, scholars can identify similarities and dissimilarities between assorted phenomena by focusing on what Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss called caracteristiques différentielles. I argue that the fundamental spatial feature which distinguishes shamans from other categories of religious specialists is their unique command of ritual techniques that enable them to move between human and preternatural space, e.g., from the mundane world to the supernatural one and back again. Moreover, I contend that \"shamanism\" is not a religion in itself but only a \"configuration\" (Åke Hultkrantz) within a religious system. This point is important because numerous scholars tend to reduce so-called \"indigenous religions\" to the category of \"shamanism,\" thereby depriving these religions of their individual identity. Instead, these religions ought to be recognized and analyzed as distinct systems of belief and practice, just as Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism are. The paradigmatic post-colonial reduction of many indigenous religious systems to \"shamanism\" has created an impoverished view of religions that are no less complex and sophisticated than the so-called \"Great Traditions.\"