MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery
Journal Article

Beyond capacity: an EAST multicenter mixed-methods study exploring surgeon perceptions on patient ratios in acute care surgery

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundOptimal provider-to-patient (PtP) ratios in acute care surgery (ACS) remain undefined despite their importance for care quality and provider sustainability. This study aimed to understand surgeon perspectives on maximum ideal ratios across trauma, emergency general surgery (EGS) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) services.MethodsThis multicenter mixed-methods study combined quantitative surveys and semistructured interviews with ACS surgeons at level I/II trauma centers across the USA (1 August 2023–19 April 2024). Service line census data were also collected. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and qualitative analysis performed; surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics.ResultsFifty-two interviews were completed. Survey response rate was 50.3% (212/421 eligible division leadership and faculty) from 40 centers across 24 states. The perceived maximum safe patient load for trauma and EGS was <20 patients when working independently, and up to 40 patients with full team support. SICU ratios were lower with most reporting ≤10 patients for independent coverage and ≤20 with team support. Regarding appropriate patient loads for junior residents and advanced practice providers, most respondents recommended ≤10 patients for trauma/EGS and ≤7 for SICU. For senior residents, most recommended ≤13 patients for trauma/EGS and ≤7 for SICU. Notably, 72% of centers exceeded their own leadership-recommended maximums for at least one service line. Qualitative analysis revealed patient acuity, team experience and competing demands as key workload modulators, with concerns about care quality degradation and burnout at higher ratios.ConclusionsThis study establishes potential upper threshold benchmarks for ACS PtP ratios with strong agreement across institutions. Division leadership should consider developing staffing models that account for patient acuity and service complexity while implementing escalation protocols for sustained high workloads. Current practices frequently exceed maximum ideal ratios, highlighting the need for evidence-based staffing guidelines that balance financial constraints with mounting evidence linking workload intensity and density to adverse outcomes.Level of evidenceIV.