Journal Article

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial

Kornmann, Verena NN, Gouma, Dirk J, Kruyt, Philip M, Crolla, Rogier MPH, Pronk, Apollo, Kelder, Johannes C, Donkervoort, Sandra C, van Duijvendijk, Peter, van Ramshorst, Bert, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, van Geloven, Anna AW, Boerma, Djamila, Loozen, Charlotte S, Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP, Roos, Daphne, Besselink, Marc GH, Bollen, Thomas L, Kortram, Kirsten, van der Peet, Donald L

2018

Overview

AbstractObjectiveTo assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.DesignMulticentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial.Setting11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016.Participants142 high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were randomly allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=66) or to percutaneous catheter drainage (n=68). High risk was defined as an acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 7 or more.Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoints were death within one year and the occurrence of major complications, defined as infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention (surgical, radiological, or endoscopic that had to be related to acute cholecystitis) within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year.ResultsThe trial was concluded early after a planned interim analysis. The rate of death did not differ between the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage group (3% v 9%, P=0.27), but major complications occurred in eight of 66 patients (12%) assigned to cholecystectomy and in 44 of 68 patients (65%) assigned to percutaneous drainage (risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.37; P<0.001). In the drainage group 45 patients (66%) required a reintervention compared with eight patients (12%) in the cholecystectomy group (P<0.001). Recurrent biliary disease occurred more often in the percutaneous drainage group (53% v 5%, P<0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was longer (9 days v 5 days, P<0.001).ConclusionLaparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous catheter drainage reduced the rate of major complications in high risk patients with acute cholecystitis.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register NTR2666.

• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
• Subject: Aged / APACHE / Catheters / Cholecystectomy / Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - adverse effects / Cholecystitis / Cholecystitis - mortality / Cholecystitis - surgery / Clinical trials / Comorbidity / Drainage - adverse effects / Evidence-based medicine / Female / Gallbladder / Gallbladder diseases / Hospitals / Humans / Laparoscopy / Male / Mortality / Netherlands / Postoperative Complications - etiology / Severity of Illness Index / Surgeons / Surgery / Treatment Outcome / Wound drainage