Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Determination of the Optimal Echocardiographic Scoring System to Quantify Carcinoid Heart Disease
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Determination of the Optimal Echocardiographic Scoring System to Quantify Carcinoid Heart Disease
Do you wish to request the book?
Determination of the Optimal Echocardiographic Scoring System to Quantify Carcinoid Heart Disease
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Determination of the Optimal Echocardiographic Scoring System to Quantify Carcinoid Heart Disease
2014
Overview
Background: Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is an important complication of metastatic neuroendocrine disease, requiring regular monitoring to enable intervention prior to right heart failure. We aimed to identify the most appropriate echocardiographic scoring systems for the quantitative assessment of CHD. Methods: In this prospective study conducted between April and October 2012 in two European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Centres of Excellence, patients with neuroendocrine tumours with liver metastases and/or carcinoid syndrome underwent transthoracic echocardiography and blood sampling for serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). Each patient was assessed according to six echocardiographic scoring systems. The individual scoring systems' feasibility, observer variability, sensitivity, specificity and correlation with the concentration biomarkers were determined. Results: 100 patients were included; 21% had echocardiographic evidence of CHD. All scores discriminated highly between those with/without CHD, with no single score performing significantly better than another. The severity, determined using all of the scoring systems, correlated with the concentration of both biomarkers, but the strongest correlations were seen between the Bhattacharyya score and serum NT-proBNP. Conclusion: All scoring systems are comparable in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CHD. There is a variation in the feasibility of the scoring systems due to varying complexity of the score components. All scores correlate with NT-proBNP and plasma 5-HIAA. The Westberg score appears to be the most optimal scoring system for use in screening of CHD whereas the more complex scoring systems are more suited to the patient with established disease who may require surgical intervention.
