Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels
by
Hassan, Muhammad
, Shamim, Muhammad Ali
, Ahmad, Sameel
, Zeeshan, Muhammad
in
Artificial neural networks
/ Civil Engineering
/ Engineering
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
/ Industrial Pollution Prevention
/ Irrigation
/ Learning theory
/ Mathematical models
/ Neural networks
/ Regression
/ Regression analysis
/ Regressions
/ Reservoirs
/ Root-mean-square errors
/ Water availability
/ Water Engineering
/ Water management
/ 토목공학
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels
by
Hassan, Muhammad
, Shamim, Muhammad Ali
, Ahmad, Sameel
, Zeeshan, Muhammad
in
Artificial neural networks
/ Civil Engineering
/ Engineering
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
/ Industrial Pollution Prevention
/ Irrigation
/ Learning theory
/ Mathematical models
/ Neural networks
/ Regression
/ Regression analysis
/ Regressions
/ Reservoirs
/ Root-mean-square errors
/ Water availability
/ Water Engineering
/ Water management
/ 토목공학
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels
by
Hassan, Muhammad
, Shamim, Muhammad Ali
, Ahmad, Sameel
, Zeeshan, Muhammad
in
Artificial neural networks
/ Civil Engineering
/ Engineering
/ Error analysis
/ Errors
/ Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
/ Industrial Pollution Prevention
/ Irrigation
/ Learning theory
/ Mathematical models
/ Neural networks
/ Regression
/ Regression analysis
/ Regressions
/ Reservoirs
/ Root-mean-square errors
/ Water availability
/ Water Engineering
/ Water management
/ 토목공학
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels
Journal Article
A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Storage dams play a very important role in irrigation especially during lean periods. For proper regulation one should make sure the availability of water according to needs and requirements. Normally regression techniques are used for the estimation of a reservoir level but this study was aimed to account for a non-linear change and variability of natural data by using Gamma Test, for input combination and data length selection, in conjunction with Artificial Neural Networking (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) based models for monthly reservoir level prediction.
Results
from both training and validation phase clearly indicate the usefulness of both ANN and LLR based prediction techniques for Water Management in general and reservoir level forecasting in particular, with LLR outperforming the ANN based model with relatively higher values of Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficnet (R
2
) and lower values of Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Biased Error (MBE). The study also demonstrates how Gamma test can be effectively used to determine the ideal input combination for data driven model development.
Publisher
Korean Society of Civil Engineers,Springer Nature B.V,대한토목학회
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.