MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan
Journal Article

Appropriateness of emergency care use: a retrospective observational study based on professional versus patients’ perspectives in Taiwan

2020
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveThe objectives of this study are to refine the measurement of appropriate emergency department (ED) use and to provide a natural observation of appropriate ED use rates based on professional versus patient perspectives.SettingTaiwan has a population of 23 million, with one single-payer universal health insurance scheme. Taiwan has no limitations on ED use, and a low barrier to ED use may be a surrogate for natural observation of users’ perspectives in ED use.ParticipantsIn 7 years, there were 1 835 860 ED visits from one million random samples of the National Health Insurance Database.MeasuresAppropriate ED use was determined according to professional standards, measured by the modified Billings New York University Emergency Department (NYU-ED) algorithm, and further analysed after the addition of prudent patient standards, measured by explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria.Statistical analysesThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to reflect the performance of appropriate ED use measures, and sensitivity analyses were conducted using different thresholds to determine the appropriateness of ED use. The generalised estimating equation model was used to measure the associations between appropriate ED use based on process and outcome criteria and covariates including sex, age, occupation, health status, place of residence, medical resources area, date and income level.ResultsAppropriate ED use based on professional criteria was 33.5%, which increased to 63.1% when patient criteria were added. The AUC, which combines both professional and patient criteria, was high (0.85).ConclusionsThe appropriate ED use rate nearly doubled when patient criteria were added to professional criteria. Explicit process-based and outcome-based criteria may be used as a supplementary measure to the implicit modified Billings NYU-ED algorithm when determining appropriate ED use.