Journal Article

Assessing the reliability of phone surveys to measure reproductive, maternal and child health knowledge among pregnant women in rural India: a feasibility study

Mulder, Nicola, Singh, Aaditya, Penugonda, Nehru, Weiss, Falyn, Scott, Kerry, Bashingwa, Jean J H, Moodley, Deshen, Ved, Rajani, Labrique, Alain, Bhatanagar, Aarushi, Honikman, Simone, Shah, Neha, LeFevre, Amnesty, Whitehead, Sonia, Parida, Dilip, Dumke, Neha, Rahul, Sai, Mendiratta, Jai, Kumar, Nayan, Miller, Molly, Shinde, Aashaka, Agarwal, Smisha, Godfrey, Anna, Ng, Angela, Chakraborty, Arpita, Tiffin, Nicki, Arora, Salil, Bhatnagar, Aarushi, Mitra, Radharani, Rajput, Shiv, Gopalakrishnan, Suresh, Mohan, Diwakar, Ummer, Osama, Chamberlain, Sara, Chandra, Rakesh, Dhar, Diva, Dutt, Priyanka, LeFevre, Amnesty Elizabeth

2022

Overview

ObjectivesEfforts to understand the factors influencing the uptake of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health and nutrition (RMNCH&N) services in high disease burden low-resource settings have often focused on face-to-face surveys or direct observations of service delivery. Increasing access to mobile phones has led to growing interest in phone surveys as a rapid, low-cost alternatives to face-to-face surveys. We assess determinants of RMNCH&N knowledge among pregnant women with access to phones and examine the reliability of alternative modalities of survey delivery.ParticipantsWomen 5–7 months pregnant with access to a phone.SettingFour districts of Madhya Pradesh, India.DesignCross-sectional surveys administered face-to-face and within 2 weeks, the same surveys were repeated among two random subsamples of the original sample: face-to-face (n=205) and caller-attended telephone interviews (n=375). Bivariate analyses, multivariable linear regression, and prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa scores are presented.ResultsKnowledge scores were low across domains: 52% for maternal nutrition and pregnancy danger signs, 58% for family planning, 47% for essential newborn care, 56% infant and young child feeding, and 58% for infant and young child care. Higher knowledge (≥1 composite score) was associated with older age; higher levels of education and literacy; living in a nuclear family; primary health decision-making; greater attendance in antenatal care and satisfaction with accredited social health activist services. Survey questions had low inter-rater and intermodal reliability (kappa<0.70) with a few exceptions. Questions with the lowest reliability included true/false questions and those with unprompted, multiple response options. Reliability may have been hampered by the sensitivity of the content, lack of privacy, enumerators’ and respondents’ profile differences, rapport, social desirability bias, and/or enumerator’s ability to adequately convey concepts or probe.ConclusionsPhone surveys are a reliable modality for generating population-level estimates data about pregnant women’s knowledge, however, should not be used for individual-level tracking.Trial registration numberNCT03576157.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: Births / Breastfeeding & lactation / Cell Phone / Cellular telephones / Child / Child Health / Children & youth / Childrens health / community child health / Consent / Coronaviruses / COVID-19 / Cross-Sectional Studies / Data collection / Family planning / Feasibility Studies / Female / Global Health / Humans / India / Infant / Infant, Newborn / Interviews / Knowledge / Literacy / Maternal & child health / maternal medicine / neonatal intensive & critical care / Newborn babies / Nutrition / Postpartum period / Pregnancy / Pregnant Women / Prenatal care / Reproducibility of Results / Rural areas / Sample size / Social desirability / Surveys and Questionnaires / Telephone / Womens health