Journal Article

Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial (RACER-knee): a study protocol

Gemperle Mannion, Elke, Scott, Chloe E H, Clement, Nicholas David, Rees, Sophie, Parsons, Helen, Smith, Toby O, Haddad, Fares S, Fox, Josephine, Skinner, John A, Mohindru, Bishal, Hutchinson, Charles E, Toms, Andrew D, Deehan, David, Underwood, Martin, Griffin, James, Khatri, Chetan, Flynn, Nicholas, Davis, Edward T, Blyth, Mark J, Ellard, David R, Mason, James, Grant, Nicholas J, Metcalfe, Andrew

2023

Overview

IntroductionRobotic-assisted knee replacement systems have been introduced to healthcare services worldwide in an effort to improve clinical outcomes for people, although high-quality evidence that they are clinically, or cost-effective remains sparse. Robotic-arm systems may improve surgical accuracy and could contribute to reduced pain, improved function and lower overall cost of total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. However, TKR with conventional instruments may be just as effective and may be quicker and cheaper. There is a need for a robust evaluation of this technology, including cost-effectiveness analyses using both within-trial and modelling approaches. This trial will compare robotic-assisted against conventional TKR to provide high-quality evidence on whether robotic-assisted knee replacement is beneficial to patients and cost-effective for healthcare systems.Methods and analysisThe Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial-Knee is a multicentre, participant-assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKR compared with TKR using conventional instruments. A total of 332 participants will be randomised (1:1) to provide 90% power for a 12-point difference in the primary outcome measure; the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months postrandomisation. Allocation concealment will be achieved using computer-based randomisation performed on the day of surgery and methods for blinding will include sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will be reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. A parallel study will collect data on the learning effects associated with robotic-arm systems.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has been approved by an ethics committee for patient participation (East Midlands—Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee, 29 July 2020. NRES number: 20/EM/0159). All results from the study will be disseminated using peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences, lay summaries and social media as appropriate.Trial registration numberISRCTN27624068.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: adult orthopaedics / adult surgery / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods / Clinical outcomes / Cost analysis / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Cost-Effectiveness Analysis / Health services / Humans / Joint replacement surgery / knee / Knee Joint / Length of stay / Multicenter Studies as Topic / orthopaedic & trauma surgery / Orthopedics / Pain / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Robotic surgery / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Surgeons / Surgery / Treatment Outcome