Journal Article

Cost efficiency of inpatient rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: the first international adaptation of the UK approach

Latimer, Christine, Gehrig, Alison, Milte, Rachel, Rabling, John, Nicks, Rebecca, Watterson, Dina, Turner-Stokes, Lynne, Reed, Melanie, Cameron, Ian, Smith, Verna, Gruen, Russell, Crotty, Maria, Turner Stokes, Lynne, Cameron, Ian D, Jolliffe, Laura, Attwood, David, Morarty, Jacqui, Cameron, Lisa, Ratcliffe, Julie, Coulter, Megan, Holland, Anne, Huggins, Troy, O’Shannessy, Elizabeth, Chen, Zhibin, Inches, Margaret, Gee, Erin, Roberts, Karen, O’Keefe, Sophie, McLellan, Sue, Palit, Mithu, Moloney, Katelyn, Ryan, Ciara, Hunter, Peter, Gabbe, Belinda, Lannin, Natasha A

2024

Overview

ObjectivesTo adapt and apply a model for evaluating the functional benefits and cost efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation to the Australian context, comparing functional outcomes and savings in the cost of ongoing care after acquired brain injury.DesignAn observational cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from admission to discharge, with follow-up to 3 years.SettingA newly established state-wide inpatient postacute rehabilitation unit in Victoria, Australia for patients with moderate to severe acquired brain injury.ParticipantsThis study included consecutive patients admitted to the programme during its first 2 years’ operation (January 2016 to December 2017). Inclusion criteria consisted of complete outcome measures recorded on admission and discharge, total n=196, mean age 44.6 years (range 17–78), males:females 72:28%, aetiology:trauma n=124 (63%), stroke n=42 (21%), diffuse n=18 (9%) and other-mixed n=12 (7%).InterventionsSpecialist inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation.Outcome measuresDependency and care costs: Northwick Park Dependency Scale/Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA); Functional independence: UK Functional Assessment Measure. Cost efficiency: (a) Time is taken to offset rehabilitation costs by savings in NPCNA-estimated costs of ongoing care and (b) net projected lifetime savings.ResultsMedian length of stay 75 (IQR: 33.5–169.5) days, mean episode costs were $A147 044 (95% CI $A126 436, $A167 652). There was a significant reduction in dependency between admission and discharge on all measures (Holm-Bonferroni corrected p<0.001) which was sustained at follow-up in those traced at 1–3 years. Savings were greatest in the highest-dependency group. Estimated mean overall reduction in ‘weekly care costs’ was $A7206, offsetting the cost of rehabilitation within 5.53 months (95% CI 2.27, 8.78). Mean projected net lifetime savings were $A13.4 million (95% CI $A11.4, $A15.4) per patient.ConclusionsThis study provides proof of principle for use of the NPCNA cost-efficiency model outside the UK and yields further evidence that rehabilitation for patients with complex disabilities represents value for money. For every dollar spent on inpatient rehabilitation in this cohort, an estimated $A91 was saved in ongoing care costs.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: Adaptation / Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Brain Injuries / Brain Injuries - economics / Brain Injuries - rehabilitation / Clinical medicine / Cost control / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Disability / Efficiency / Female / Health Care Costs / Hospitalization - economics / Humans / Inpatients / Length of Stay - economics / Long term health care / Male / Middle Aged / Needs analysis / Original Research / Patients / Prospective Studies / Rehabilitation / Rehabilitation Centers - economics / Rehabilitation Medicine / Stroke / Traumatic brain injury / United Kingdom / Victoria / Young Adult