Journal Article

Talking in primary care (TIP): protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in UK primary care to assess clinical and cost-effectiveness of communication skills e-learning for practitioners on patients’ musculoskeletal pain and enablement

Ridd, Matthew J, Bostock, Jennifer, Pollet, Sebastien, Everitt, Hazel A, Clarson, Lorna, Islam, Nazrul, Teasdale, Emma, Garfield, Kirsty, Dewar-Haggart, Rachel, Mallen, Christian, Cross, Nadia, Robinson, Michelle E, Stuart, Beth, Little, Paul, Becque, Taeko, Leydon, Geraldine M, Atherton, Helen, Howick, Jeremy, Nuttall, Jacqui, Bishop, Felicity L, Lee, Paul H, Morrison, Leanne, Vennik, Jane, Herbert, Amy

2024

Overview

IntroductionEffective communication can help optimise healthcare interactions and patient outcomes. However, few interventions have been tested clinically, subjected to cost-effectiveness analysis or are sufficiently brief and well-described for implementation in primary care. This paper presents the protocol for determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a rigorously developed brief eLearning tool, EMPathicO, among patients with and without musculoskeletal pain.Methods and analysisA cluster randomised controlled trial in general practitioner (GP) surgeries in England and Wales serving patients from diverse geographic, socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. GP surgeries are randomised (1:1) to receive EMPathicO e-learning immediately, or at trial end. Eligible practitioners (eg, GPs, physiotherapists and nurse practitioners) are involved in managing primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Patient recruitment is managed by practice staff and researchers. Target recruitment is 840 adults with and 840 without musculoskeletal pain consulting face-to-face, by telephone or video. Patients complete web-based questionnaires at preconsultation baseline, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months later. There are two patient-reported primary outcomes: pain intensity and patient enablement. Cost-effectiveness is considered from the National Health Service and societal perspectives. Secondary and process measures include practitioner patterns of use of EMPathicO, practitioner-reported self-efficacy and intentions, patient-reported symptom severity, quality of life, satisfaction, perceptions of practitioner empathy and optimism, treatment expectancies, anxiety, depression and continuity of care. Purposive subsamples of patients, practitioners and practice staff take part in up to two qualitative, semistructured interviews.Ethics approval and disseminationApproved by the South Central Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee on 1 July 2022 and the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales on 6 July 2022 (REC reference 22/SC/0145; IRAS project ID 312208). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed academic publications, conference presentations and patient and practitioner outlets. If successful, EMPathicO could quickly be made available at a low cost to primary care practices across the country.Trial registration number ISRCTN18010240.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: Adult / Arthritis / Communication / Computer-Assisted Instruction / Cost analysis / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Cost-Effectiveness Analysis / Distance learning / eHealth / Empathy / England / Humans / Intervention / Life satisfaction / MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING / Musculoskeletal disorders / Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy / Neck pain / Nurses / Online instruction / Optimism / Osteoarthritis / Patient satisfaction / Patient-Centered Care / Practice nursing / Primary care / Primary Health Care / Quality of Life / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Recruitment / State Medicine / Training