Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
by
Stiggelbout, Anne M
, Pieterse, Arwen H
, Gärtner, Fania R
, Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
in
Communication
/ concept
/ Decision making models
/ decision process
/ definition
/ healthcare professional
/ Medical research
/ patient
/ Patients
/ Professionals
/ Researchers
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ time trends
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
by
Stiggelbout, Anne M
, Pieterse, Arwen H
, Gärtner, Fania R
, Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
in
Communication
/ concept
/ Decision making models
/ decision process
/ definition
/ healthcare professional
/ Medical research
/ patient
/ Patients
/ Professionals
/ Researchers
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ time trends
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
by
Stiggelbout, Anne M
, Pieterse, Arwen H
, Gärtner, Fania R
, Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
in
Communication
/ concept
/ Decision making models
/ decision process
/ definition
/ healthcare professional
/ Medical research
/ patient
/ Patients
/ Professionals
/ Researchers
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ time trends
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
Journal Article
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectivesTo (1) provide an up-to-date overview of shared decision making (SDM)-models, (2) give insight in the prominence of components present in SDM-models, (3) describe who is identified as responsible within the components (patient, healthcare professional, both, none), (4) show the occurrence of SDM-components over time, and (5) present an SDM-map to identify SDM-components seen as key, per healthcare setting.DesignSystematic review.Eligibility criteriaPeer-reviewed articles in English presenting a new or adapted model of SDM.Information sourcesAcademic Search Premier, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published up to and including September 2, 2019.ResultsForty articles were included, each describing a unique SDM-model. Twelve models were generic, the others were specific to a healthcare setting. Fourteen were based on empirical data, 26 primarily on analytical thinking. Fifty-three different elements were identified and clustered into 24 components. Overall, Describe treatment options was the most prominent component across models. Components present in >50% of models were: Make the decision (75%), Patient preferences (65%), Tailor information (65%), Deliberate (58%), Create choice awareness (55%), and Learn about the patient (53%). In the majority of the models (27/40), both healthcare professional and patient were identified as actors. Over time, Describe treatment options and Make the decision are the two components which are present in most models in any time period. Create choice awareness stood out for being present in a markedly larger proportion of models over time.ConclusionsThis review provides an up-to-date overview of SDM-models, showing that SDM-models quite consistently share some components but that a unified view on what SDM is, is still lacking. Clarity about what SDM constitutes is essential though for implementation, assessment, and research purposes. A map is offered to identify SDM-components seen as key.Trial registrationPROSPERO registration CRD42015019740
Publisher
British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.