Journal Article

Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality

Pereira Gray, Denis J, Sidaway-Lee, Kate, White, Eleanor, Evans, Philip H, Thorne, Angus

2018

Overview

ObjectiveContinuity of care is a long-standing feature of healthcare, especially of general practice. It is associated with increased patient satisfaction, increased take-up of health promotion, greater adherence to medical advice and decreased use of hospital services. This review aims to examine whether there is a relationship between the receipt of continuity of doctor care and mortality.DesignSystematic review without meta-analysis.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science, from 1996 to 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesPeer-reviewed primary research articles, published in English which reported measured continuity of care received by patients from any kind of doctor, in any setting, in any country, related to measured mortality of those patients.ResultsOf the 726 articles identified in searches, 22 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The studies were all cohort or cross-sectional and most adjusted for multiple potential confounding factors. These studies came from nine countries with very different cultures and health systems. We found such heterogeneity of continuity and mortality measurement methods and time frames that it was not possible to combine the results of studies. However, 18 (81.8%) high-quality studies reported statistically significant reductions in mortality, with increased continuity of care. 16 of these were with all-cause mortality. Three others showed no association and one demonstrated mixed results. These significant protective effects occurred with both generalist and specialist doctors.ConclusionsThis first systematic review reveals that increased continuity of care by doctors is associated with lower mortality rates. Although all the evidence is observational, patients across cultural boundaries appear to benefit from continuity of care with both generalist and specialist doctors. Many of these articles called for continuity to be given a higher priority in healthcare planning. Despite substantial, successive, technical advances in medicine, interpersonal factors remain important.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016042091.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: Ambulatory care / Bias / Continuity of care / Continuity of Patient Care - standards / Diabetes / doctor patient relationship / doctors / Evidence-based medicine / Family physicians / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Hospitals / Humans / Mortality / Patient Satisfaction / Patient-Centred Medicine / Physician patient relationships / Physician-Patient Relations / Physicians / Physicians - standards / Primary care / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Systematic review