Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity
Do you wish to request the book?
2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity
2019
Overview
Background The optimal diagnostic strategy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known, and no test is shown to clearly differentiate colonization from symptomatic infection. We hypothesized that detection and/or quantification of stool toxins would associate with severe disease and adverse outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study among subjects with CDI diagnosed in 2016 at the University of Michigan. The clinical microbiology laboratory tested for glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxins A/B by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Discordant results reflexed to PCR for the tcdB gene. Stool toxin levels were quantified via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay (CCA). C. difficile was isolated by anaerobic culture and ribotyped. Severe CDI was defined by the IDSA criteria: white blood cell count >15,000 cells/µL or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine above baseline. The primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, ICU admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analysis included standard bivariable tests and adjusted models via logistic regression. Results From 565 adult patients, we obtained 646 samples; 199 (30.8%) contained toxins by EIA. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not our primary outcomes on unadjusted analysis. After adjustment for putative confounders, we still did not observe an association between toxin positivity and our primary outcomes. Stool toxin levels by CCA >6.4 ng/mL associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not the primary outcomes. Compared with the period from 2010 to 2013, the circulating ribotypes of C. difficile at our institution changed in 2016. Notably ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, and ribotype 027 fell to 9.3% (Table 2). The incidence of ribotype 014-027 has remained stable at 18.9%, but this strain was associated with both IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (OR = 3.32; P = 0.001). Conclusion Toxin detection by EIA/CCA associated with IDSA severity, but this study was unable to confirm an association with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, and this may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Subject
