Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities: Did This Principle Ever Exist?
by
Rosencranz, Armin
, Jamwal, Kanika
in
Clean Development Mechanism
/ Clean energy
/ Clean technology
/ Climate change
/ Developed countries
/ Developing countries
/ Differentiation
/ Emissions
/ Environmental law
/ Environmental policy
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gas emissions
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Industrialized nations
/ Kyoto Protocol
/ LDCs
/ Paris Agreement
/ Responsibilities
/ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities: Did This Principle Ever Exist?
by
Rosencranz, Armin
, Jamwal, Kanika
in
Clean Development Mechanism
/ Clean energy
/ Clean technology
/ Climate change
/ Developed countries
/ Developing countries
/ Differentiation
/ Emissions
/ Environmental law
/ Environmental policy
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gas emissions
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Industrialized nations
/ Kyoto Protocol
/ LDCs
/ Paris Agreement
/ Responsibilities
/ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities: Did This Principle Ever Exist?
by
Rosencranz, Armin
, Jamwal, Kanika
in
Clean Development Mechanism
/ Clean energy
/ Clean technology
/ Climate change
/ Developed countries
/ Developing countries
/ Differentiation
/ Emissions
/ Environmental law
/ Environmental policy
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gas emissions
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Industrialized nations
/ Kyoto Protocol
/ LDCs
/ Paris Agreement
/ Responsibilities
/ United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities: Did This Principle Ever Exist?
Journal Article
Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities: Did This Principle Ever Exist?
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This article argues that the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)’s conception of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDRRC) was never effectively implemented through the Kyoto Protocol. The investments under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism suggest that CBDRRC has been used by developed countries to buy a “right to pollute”, i.e., maintaining or even increasing their greenhouse gas emissions, while investing in clean energy in developing nations, thus defeating the essence of CBDRRC as intended under the UNFCCC.
Second, it points out that the Paris Agreement reflects a significant shift in the overall concept of CBDRRC, both in terms of its textual understanding as well as its implementation. A qualifier, “in the light of national circumstances”, was added to the principle of CBDRRC in the Paris Agreement, allowing a form of voluntary self-differentiation. This qualifier diluted a top-down, objective analysis of States’ commitments. For several scholars, this shift has meant a softening of the principle, making the “differentiation” more dynamic and flexible.
In the authors’ opinion, the qualifier is a fundamental modification of the principle to make it politically more palatable. It completely disregards the notion of historical responsibility for climate change, which was the cornerstone of CBDRRC as conceived under the UNFCCC. Therefore, rather than presenting a more flexible understanding of UNFCCC’s conception of CBDRRC, the Paris Agreement marks a total departure from it. Lacking an explicit redefinition of the principle of CBDRRC, it is misleading to contend that the Paris Agreement is still anchored in it.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor)
Subject
/ LDCs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.