MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children
Journal Article

568. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Retapamulin for Nasal and Rectal Decolonization of Mupirocin-Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Children

2019
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus, particularly MRSA, is a crucial risk factor for subsequent infection. Decolonization measures are often undertaken to prevent recurrent MRSA infection and transmission; however, increasing rate of resistance to the gold standard mupirocin has been noted globally. At our institution, there is >85% high-level resistance to mupirocin among strains from a geographically defined genotypic cluster of CA-MRSA in children from Orthodox communities in Brooklyn. Retapamulin is a topical bacteriostatic pleuromutilin antibiotic that has demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against mupirocin-resistant isolates from pediatric patients with MRSA infection presenting to our institution suggesting that it may be a promising alternative decolonization therapy. We sought to determine the efficacy of retapamulin as a topical decolonizing agent against mupirocin-resistant MRSA among the identified high-risk Brooklyn cluster via a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded phase three trial. Methods Children aged 9 months-17 years who resided in high-risk zip codes used as a proxy for Orthodox Jewish predominant neighborhoods were recruited either from inpatient units at NYU Langone or at a partnered community clinic. Participants were screened via nasal and rectal culture to detect MRSA colonization. Enrolled participants were randomized to receive either retapamulin or placebo and instructed to apply the ointment nasally and rectally twice a day for 5 days. Repeat nasal and rectal swab cultures were collected one week and one month after completion of topical therapy to assess MRSA colonization status. The change in colonization rates was assessed via Fisher’s exact test. Results 173 participants were screened from December 2017 to March 2019 in which 47 ultimately underwent randomization (23 in the retapamulin group and 24 in the placebo group). The median age was 3.9 years (SD 3.5 years). Children in the placebo group were 15.2 times more likely to be colonized with MRSA after one week of the decolonization protocol compared with the retapamulin group (OR 15.2, CI 2.8–81, P = 0.0004). However, children in the placebo group were only 1.1 times more likely to be colonized with MRSA after one month compared with the retapamulin group (OR 1.1, CI 0.3–3.9, P = 1). (*Full data analysis currently in progress with additional results available soon.) Conclusion In this small pilot randomized trial, children who received retapamulin had a significantly lower rate of MRSA colonization and higher rates of clearance compared with placebo at one week post decolonization, but no significant difference at the one month mark. These data suggest that retapamulin is a promising alternative short-term nasal and peri-rectal decolonzing therapy in order to prevent infections and the spread of this mupirocin-resistant MRSA clone among pediatric patients in this affected community and our hospital. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Publisher
Oxford University Press