Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains
Do you wish to request the book?
Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Patient-based integrated teaching program with the inclusion of psychomotor and affective domains
2017
Overview
[5] Although lecturing facilitates the sharing of information with a large audience of students transmitting effective factual information,[4] it exposes the students merely to content, leading to passive reception of information, whereas it is the active processing of information that leads to learning[4,6-8] and in which students are encouraged to involve in the building and testing their own mental models from information that they attain. According to Table 5, the students responded that this ITP helped to analyze the topic clinically and guided them how to approach the patient. [22] The most common method of instruction in ITP is also lecture, at last leading to passive reception of integrated information. [...]to engage the senses of the students and result in active learning, patient-based ITP was conceived along with inclusion of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains and a real case of nephrotic syndrome. In the closed-ended responses in feedback, majority of the students agreed that teaching aids were adequately used (72%), learning objectives were identified (64%), lectures were in logical sequence (49% agreed, 42% strongly agreed), helped in understanding the concept of the topic (48% agreed, 37% strongly agreed), adequate discussion occurred (20% strongly agreed, 65% agreed), incorporation of psychomotor skills was helpful (66%), doctor-patient relationship was better understood (60% strongly agreed), and summarization was useful (53%).
