Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Neuroscience and Sartre's Account of Bad Faith
by
John Valentine
in
Attribution theory
/ Behavioral neuroscience
/ Cerebral hemispheres
/ Chickens
/ Cognitive psychology
/ Concept of being
/ Consciousness
/ Neuroscience
/ Phenomena
/ Waiters
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Neuroscience and Sartre's Account of Bad Faith
by
John Valentine
in
Attribution theory
/ Behavioral neuroscience
/ Cerebral hemispheres
/ Chickens
/ Cognitive psychology
/ Concept of being
/ Consciousness
/ Neuroscience
/ Phenomena
/ Waiters
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Neuroscience and Sartre's Account of Bad Faith
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The article explores the possibility that studies in cerebral commissurotomy (severing of the corpus callosum) may shed some light on Jean-Paul Sartre's account of bad faith. I examine this issue from both a descriptive and an explanatory point of view. My conclusion is that Sartre and various neuroscientists seem generally to agree on the description of self-deception, but they substantially disagree on how the phenomenon is to be explained. I argue that Sartre's account does not seem fully adequate, while the neuroscientific approach may have explanatory potential if certain conceptual issues are resolved. I also argue that, carefully delimited, the neuroscientific stance complements Sartre's approach.
Publisher
Pennsylvania State University Press,Penn State University Press
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.