Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
PerDet: Machine-Learning-Based UAV GPS Spoofing Detection Using Perception Data
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
PerDet: Machine-Learning-Based UAV GPS Spoofing Detection Using Perception Data
Do you wish to request the book?
PerDet: Machine-Learning-Based UAV GPS Spoofing Detection Using Perception Data
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
PerDet: Machine-Learning-Based UAV GPS Spoofing Detection Using Perception Data
2022
Overview
To ensure that unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) positioning is not affected by GPS spoofing signals, we propose PerDet, a perception-data-based UAV GPS spoofing detection approach utilizing machine learning algorithms. Based on the principle of the position estimation process and attitude estimation process, we choose the data gathered by the accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, GPS and barometer as features. Although these sensors have different shortcomings, their variety makes sure that the selected perception data can compensate for each other. We collect the experimental data through real flights, which make PerDet more practical. Furthermore, we run various machine learning algorithms on our dataset and select the most effective classifier as the detector. Through the performance evaluation and comparison, we demonstrate that PerDet is better than existing methods and is an effective method with a detecting rate of 99.69%. For a fair comparison, we reproduce the existing method and run it on our dataset to compare the performance between this method and our PerDet approach.
