Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas
Do you wish to request the book?
Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas
2020
Overview
Purpose18F-FDopa PET imaging of gliomas is routinely interpreted with standardized uptake value (SUV)-derived indices. This study aimed to determine the added value of dynamic 18F-FDopa PET parameters for predicting the molecular features of newly diagnosed gliomas.MethodsWe retrospectively included 58 patients having undergone an 18F-FDopa PET for establishing the initial diagnosis of gliomas, whose molecular features were additionally characterized according to the WHO 2016 classification. Dynamic parameters, involving time-to-peak (TTP) values and curve slopes, were tested for the prediction of glioma types in addition to current static parameters, i.e., tumor-to-normal brain or tumor-to-striatum SUV ratios and metabolic tumor volume (MTV).ResultsThere were 21 IDH mutant without 1p/19q co-deletion (IDH+/1p19q−) gliomas, 16 IDH mutants with 1p/19q co-deletion (IDH+/1p19q+) gliomas, and 21 IDH wildtype (IDH−) gliomas. Dynamic parameters enabled differentiating the gliomas according to these molecular features, whereas static parameters did not. In particular, a longer TTP was the single best independent predictor for identifying (1) IDH mutation status (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.789, global accuracy of 74% for the criterion of a TTP ≥ 5.4 min) and (2) 1p/19q co-deletion status (AUC of 0.679, global accuracy of 69% for the criterion of a TTP ≥ 6.9 min). Moreover, the TTP from IDH− gliomas was significantly shorter than those from both IDH+/1p19q− and IDH+/1p19q+ (p ≤ 0.007).ConclusionPrediction of the molecular features of newly diagnosed gliomas with 18F-FDopa PET and especially of the presence or not of an IDH mutation, may be obtained with dynamic but not with current static uptake parameters.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
