Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
‘Can’t buy me legitimacy’: the elusive stability of Mideast rentier regimes
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
‘Can’t buy me legitimacy’: the elusive stability of Mideast rentier regimes
Do you wish to request the book?
‘Can’t buy me legitimacy’: the elusive stability of Mideast rentier regimes
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
‘Can’t buy me legitimacy’: the elusive stability of Mideast rentier regimes
2017
Overview
This paper qualitatively revisits the thesis that rentier regimes can draw on their non-tax revenues to buy political legitimacy and stability. Exploring the material/moral interplay in Mideast rentier politics, I show why and how rents may provide for provisional, but not sustainable, stability for authoritarian rentier regimes. I propose distinguishing between negative and positive political legitimacy, the former being about ‘what is legitimate’ (liberty
vs
security), and the latter about ‘who is the legitimator’ (divine/hereditary right
vs
popular sovereignty). Sustainable stability is predicated on having both legitimacies. Rentier regimes, however, often draw exclusively on negative political legitimacy. These regimes can use rents to buy time — through coercion and expediency — contriving an imagery of a lusty Leviathan. But due to the diversity of rents and the temporal shifts in their revenues, this social contract is materially contingent and morally frail — rendering authoritarian rentier regimes, not least in the Middle East, more mortal than they, and many observers, are ready to admit.
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK,Palgrave Macmillan
Subject
