MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2
Journal Article

Relationship between Training Sample Size and Rice Mapping Accuracy Using Sentinels 1 and 2

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In the last few decades, with the progress of science and the variety of optical and radar satellites, it has become possible to monitor and classify crops on a large scale. However, one of the main challenges in satellite imagery classification is the number of required training samples. Therefore, this study has been conducted to investigate the relationship between the training sample size and the classification accuracy of rice and non-rice covers. For this purpose, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images, Random Forest classifier (RF), and Google Earth Engine were used. In total, 2,500 rice samples and 9,500 non-rice samples were prepared in the study area, and 100 different runs were performed with varying training sample sizes. The results showed that the backscatter time series of Sentinel-1 images make it possible to distinguish rice from non-rice covers with high accuracy. So, the inputs to the Random Forest classifier included the Backscatter Slope (BS), the Backscatter Difference (BD) between the maximum and minimum values of the time series, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). According to the results, there is a non-linear relationship between the increase in the training sample size and the classification accuracy i.e., the accuracy decreases with the increase in the number of samples. The highest overall accuracy and kappa coefficient were obtained using 50% of the training samples. Therefore, with this sample size, the rice cultivation map was determined and the rice and non-rice areas were obtained 158,384 ha and 2,225,816 ha, respectively. The highest overall accuracy (89%) and kappa coefficient (0.86) were obtained when one training sample per 181 ha of rice fields and one training sample per 669 ha of non-rice cover were used. By doubling the number of samples, the kappa coefficient and overall accuracy were 0.84 and 87%, respectively. Finally, according to the results, increasing the number of training samples does not necessarily increase the classification accuracy.