Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Profile of Argumentation Ability of Undergraduate Students In Chemistry Education Based On Non-Routine Problems
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Profile of Argumentation Ability of Undergraduate Students In Chemistry Education Based On Non-Routine Problems
Do you wish to request the book?
Profile of Argumentation Ability of Undergraduate Students In Chemistry Education Based On Non-Routine Problems
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Profile of Argumentation Ability of Undergraduate Students In Chemistry Education Based On Non-Routine Problems
2021
Overview
This study aims to determine the profile of the argumentation ability of undergraduate chemical education students. The research was conducted by giving 3 questions based on non-routine problems. In these questions, questions are given that demand statements of claims, data, warrants, backings, qualifiers, and rebuttals. The answers of 47 students were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis techniques. The results of the analysis show that the students' argumentation skills are included in the type of argumentation without rebuttal. Based on the rubric of the argumentation level without rebuttal, it shows that most of the students' abilities are at level 2, namely being able to make claims, but the data, warrants, and backing used are quite good in supporting the claims. The results of the distributed questionnaires showed that most of the students had not mastered argumentation. Experiencing the rigors of thinking in working on argumentative questions makes students motivated to study further. These findings will be the basis for the need to train students' argumentation skills with various methods so as to improve students' argumentation skills.
Publisher
EDP Sciences
