Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Scale-Similarity Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Closure for Supercell Simulations at Kilometer-Scale Resolutions: Comparison against a Large-Eddy Simulation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Scale-Similarity Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Closure for Supercell Simulations at Kilometer-Scale Resolutions: Comparison against a Large-Eddy Simulation
Do you wish to request the book?
Scale-Similarity Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Closure for Supercell Simulations at Kilometer-Scale Resolutions: Comparison against a Large-Eddy Simulation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Scale-Similarity Subgrid-Scale Turbulence Closure for Supercell Simulations at Kilometer-Scale Resolutions: Comparison against a Large-Eddy Simulation
2021
Overview
In numerical simulations of deep convection at kilometer-scale horizontal resolutions, in-cloud subgrid-scale (SGS) turbulence plays an important role in the transport of heat, moisture, and other scalars. By coarse graining a 50 m high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) of an idealized supercell storm to kilometer-scale grid spacings ranging from 250 m to 4 km, the SGS fluxes of heat, moisture, cloud, and precipitating water contents are diagnosed a priori. The kilometer-scale simulations are shown to be within the “gray zone” as in-cloud SGS turbulent fluxes are comparable in magnitude to the resolved fluxes at 4 km spacing, and do not become negligible until ~500 m spacing. Vertical and horizontal SGS fluxes are of comparable magnitudes; both exhibit nonlocal characteristics associated with deep convection as opposed to local gradient-diffusion type of turbulent mixing. As such, they are poorly parameterized by eddy-diffusivity-based closures. To improve the SGS representation of turbulent fluxes in deep convective storms, a scale-similarity LES closure is adapted to kilometer-scale simulations. The model exhibits good correlations with LES-diagnosed SGS fluxes, and is capable of representing countergradient fluxes. In a posteriori tests, supercell storms simulated with the refined similarity closure model at kilometer-scale resolutions show better agreement with the LES benchmark in terms of SGS fluxes than those with a turbulent-kinetic-energy-based gradient-diffusion scheme. However, it underestimates the strength of updrafts, which is suggested to be a consequence of the model effective resolution being lower than the native grid resolution.
