Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Playing Dice for the Polis: Pitched Battle in Greek Military Thought
by
Konijnendijk, Roel
in
Classical studies
/ Greek civilization
/ Military policy
/ Military strategy
/ Morality
/ Principles
/ Speeches
/ War
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Playing Dice for the Polis: Pitched Battle in Greek Military Thought
by
Konijnendijk, Roel
in
Classical studies
/ Greek civilization
/ Military policy
/ Military strategy
/ Morality
/ Principles
/ Speeches
/ War
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Playing Dice for the Polis: Pitched Battle in Greek Military Thought
Journal Article
Playing Dice for the Polis: Pitched Battle in Greek Military Thought
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Recent scholarship has repeatedly challenged the notion that Greek warfare was ever characterized by rule-bound battles in open ground. This article builds on those challenges by asking to what extent a morality that favored pitched battle affected military thinking at all. Some appeals to such values survive from the Classical period, but they are ambiguous, ineffectual, and often contested. There is much more consistent evidence for the opposite view: that the risks of open battle were too great, that engaging in them was therefore irresponsible, and that other kinds of military operation were preferred.
Publisher
Johns Hopkins University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.