Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison
by
Mitchell, Meghan M.
, Pyrooz, David C.
, Fahmy, Chantal
, Clark, Kendra J.
in
Attrition
/ Best practice
/ Bias
/ Criminology and Criminal Justice
/ Data
/ Ex-convicts
/ Law and Criminolgy
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Magnitude
/ Methodology of the Social Sciences
/ Multiple imputation
/ Null hypothesis
/ Original Paper
/ Recidivism
/ Reentry
/ Selection bias
/ Sociology
/ Statistical significance
/ Statistics
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison
by
Mitchell, Meghan M.
, Pyrooz, David C.
, Fahmy, Chantal
, Clark, Kendra J.
in
Attrition
/ Best practice
/ Bias
/ Criminology and Criminal Justice
/ Data
/ Ex-convicts
/ Law and Criminolgy
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Magnitude
/ Methodology of the Social Sciences
/ Multiple imputation
/ Null hypothesis
/ Original Paper
/ Recidivism
/ Reentry
/ Selection bias
/ Sociology
/ Statistical significance
/ Statistics
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison
by
Mitchell, Meghan M.
, Pyrooz, David C.
, Fahmy, Chantal
, Clark, Kendra J.
in
Attrition
/ Best practice
/ Bias
/ Criminology and Criminal Justice
/ Data
/ Ex-convicts
/ Law and Criminolgy
/ Longitudinal studies
/ Magnitude
/ Methodology of the Social Sciences
/ Multiple imputation
/ Null hypothesis
/ Original Paper
/ Recidivism
/ Reentry
/ Selection bias
/ Sociology
/ Statistical significance
/ Statistics
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison
Journal Article
Non-random Study Attrition: Assessing Correction Techniques and the Magnitude of Bias in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objectives
Longitudinal data offer many advantages to criminological research yet suffer from attrition, namely in the form of sample selection bias. Attrition may undermine reaching valid inferences by introducing systematic differences between the retained and attrited samples. We explored (1) if attrition biases correlates of recidivism, (2) the magnitude of bias, and (3) how well methods of correction account for such bias.
Methods
Using data from the LoneStar Project, a representative longitudinal sample of reentering men in Texas, we examined correlates of recidivism using official measures of recidivism under four sample conditions: full sample, listwise deleted sample, multiply imputed sample, and two-stage corrected sample. We compare and contrast the results regressing rearrest on a range of covariates derived from a pre-release baseline interview across the four sample conditions.
Results
Attrition bias was present in 44% of variables and null hypothesis significance tests differed for the correlates of recidivism in the full and retained samples. The bias was substantial, altering effect sizes for recidivism by a factor as large as 1.6. Neither the Heckman correction nor multiple imputation adequately corrected for bias. Instead, results from listwise deletion most closely mirrored the results of the full sample with 89% concordance.
Conclusions
It is vital that researchers examine attrition-based selection bias and recognize the implications it has on their data when generating evidence of theoretical, policy, or practical significance. We outline best practices for examining the magnitude of attrition and analyzing longitudinal data affected by sample selection.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.