Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Grounding, infinite regress, and the thomistic cosmological argument
by
Oberle, Thomas
in
Causality
/ Debates
/ Inheritances
/ Metaphysics
/ Ontology
/ Philosophy of religion
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Grounding, infinite regress, and the thomistic cosmological argument
by
Oberle, Thomas
in
Causality
/ Debates
/ Inheritances
/ Metaphysics
/ Ontology
/ Philosophy of religion
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Grounding, infinite regress, and the thomistic cosmological argument
Journal Article
Grounding, infinite regress, and the thomistic cosmological argument
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
A prominent Thomistic cosmological argument maintains that an infinite regress of causes, which exhibits a certain pattern of ontological dependence among its members, would be vicious and so must terminate in a first member. Interestingly, Jonathan Schaffer offers a similar argument in the contemporary grounding literature for the view called metaphysical foundationalism. I consider the striking similarities between both arguments and conclude that both are unsuccessful for the same reason. I argue this negative result gives us indirect reason to consider metaphysical infinitism as a genuine possibility, the view that chains of ontological dependence or ground can descend indefinitely.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.