Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Smart machine fault diagnostics based on fault specified discrete wavelet transform
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Smart machine fault diagnostics based on fault specified discrete wavelet transform
Do you wish to request the book?
Smart machine fault diagnostics based on fault specified discrete wavelet transform
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Smart machine fault diagnostics based on fault specified discrete wavelet transform
2023
Overview
This study examines the impact of the mother wavelet, sensor selection, and machine learning (ML) models for smart fault diagnosis of rotating machines via discrete wavelet transform (DWT). The ability of Daubechies, Haar, Biorthogonal (Bior), Symlets (Sym), and Coiflets (Coif) wavelets is measured in terms of distinguishing imbalance, horizontal/vertical misalignment, and overhang/underhang bearing ball, cage, and outer race faults. For this purpose, single-step and two-step fault monitoring (SSFM and TSFM) approaches are proposed. In SSFM, the ML models detect the fault type by the healthy and faulty signals. In TSFM, the built models first determined whether the machine is faulty or not. If it is, then the models detect the fault type. As ML models, Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost with C4.5 (AB-C4.5), and two artificial neural network algorithms are trained by the features of DWT. Besides, the effect of the sensor type on the fault diagnosis is measured by considering the tachometer, microphone, and two accelerometers individually and combined. The results are interpreted regarding the evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, confusion matrix, and model built time. It is concluded that Bior3.1 and Haar wavelets distinguish the fault type more accurately than other wavelets. Besides, the RF-Bior3.1 give the best results for SSFM and TSFM by accuracy values of 99.80% and 99.98%, respectively. It is also found that the sensor type is correlated with the selected mother wavelet.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
