Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Study of Nine Intact Rock Failure Criteria via Analytical Geometry
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Study of Nine Intact Rock Failure Criteria via Analytical Geometry
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Study of Nine Intact Rock Failure Criteria via Analytical Geometry
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative Study of Nine Intact Rock Failure Criteria via Analytical Geometry
2022
Overview
The existing comparative studies of intact rock failure criteria do not typically consider the tensile stress zone and failure angle prediction. A new comparative study of nine intact rock strength criteria worth to list them here was performed under the framework of analytical geometry, with respect to their geometric characteristics in different cutting planes of the failure envelopes in three-dimensional space as well as predictive capacities for strength and failure angle. For this purpose, a universal failure angle formula was derived as a guideline to deduce the specific expression for each criterion. The σ1–σ3 cutting plane displays two categories of the intact rock failure criteria: overlapping and separate compressive and tensile meridian boundaries. Experimental strength data and failure angle observation of two sandstones under complex compressive stress conditions highlight the failure criteria of Mogi-1967, Mogi-1971, nonlinear unified and Hoek–Brown in terms of strength and failure angle prediction. It is probably the first of its kind to date to evaluate different intact rock failure criteria by relating the failure angle and strength. This innovative comparative work enlightens the future advancement of the intact rock failure criterion with the consideration of the tensile stress zone and failure angle observation.HighlightsAnalytical geometric technique revealed the existing intact rock failure criteria were inadequate to reflect the tensile behaviors or failure angle.A universal failure angle formula was derived for any failure function through stress transformation.An innovative procedure relating the failure angle and strength predictions was proposed and used to evaluate nine intact rock failure criteria.
