Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Selection of Six Sigma projects based on integrated multi-criteria decision-making methods: the case of the software development industry
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Selection of Six Sigma projects based on integrated multi-criteria decision-making methods: the case of the software development industry
Do you wish to request the book?
Selection of Six Sigma projects based on integrated multi-criteria decision-making methods: the case of the software development industry
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Selection of Six Sigma projects based on integrated multi-criteria decision-making methods: the case of the software development industry
2023
Overview
This study aims to develop a methodology in which alternative Six Sigma projects are prioritized and selected using appropriate multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in the software development industry. The methodology developed in this paper proposes an MCDM-based approach for researchers to prioritize and select Six Sigma projects for software development projects. The study reveals that by prioritizing software projects with CRITIC, Entropy, and ARAS methods, software companies will be able to achieve their goals such as quality, process improvement, resource allocation, and customer satisfaction. CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Entropy methods were used to determine criterion weights and a new Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method was used to rank alternatives in ordering software development projects. According to the results obtained, one of 7 software development projects (Project 6) was considered the highest priority project for Chidamber and Kemerer's (C&K) software quality metrics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that implements CRITIC and ARAS methods in the Six Sigma project prioritization and selection process for software development projects.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
