MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
Journal Article

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA)-Decalcified, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissue Shows Comparable Quality and Quantity of DNA to Non-Decalcified Tissue in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Bone tissue decalcification is essential for histopathological evaluation, but conventional methods using inorganic acids degrade nucleic acids, limiting molecular testing. EDTA is known to better preserve DNA, but its suitability for next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical settings remains to be validated. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 752 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples undergoing NGS between January 2022 and October 2024. Of these, 31 were decalcified using EDTA (Osteosoft, Merck, Germany). DNA was extracted using the Qiagen AllPrep® kit and quantified using Qubit and NanoDrop. Libraries were prepared with a custom 30-gene Ampliseq panel and sequenced on the Ion Torrent platform. Sequencing was deemed suboptimal if <95% of target regions reached ≥250X depth. Results were compared to 721 non-decalcified FFPE samples. Results: Suboptimal sequencing occurred in 9.7% of EDTA-decalcified and 9.0% of non-decalcified cases (p = 0.9). DNA concentration (Qubit) and NanoDrop 260/280 ratios were not significantly different (p = 0.4 and p = 0.8, respectively), though EDTA cases had lower DNA concentrations (NanoDrop, p = 0.006) and 260/230 ratios (p = 0.002). Mutation detection in decalcified samples was consistent with known mutation profiles for respective tumor types. Conclusions: EDTA-decalcified FFPE bone tissues produce NGS results comparable to non-decalcified specimens, with similar sequencing success rates and acceptable DNA quality. These findings support the use of EDTA as a suitable decalcification method for molecular diagnostics, enabling broader inclusion of bone specimens in clinical testing.