MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI
Journal Article

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high‐resolution dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a kind of low‐grade malignant spindle cell neoplasm, the diagnosis, and treatment, which have markedly attracted clinicians’ attention for its repeated recurrence. High‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR‐MRI) has shown unique capabilities in diagnosis of various cutaneous tumors. Materials and methods Data of 29 patients with clinically suspected DFSPs and undergoing dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) HR‐MRI preoperatively were prospectively collected. The HR‐MRI qualitative features were evaluated and compared. The DCE‐associated quantitative parameters and the time‐signal intensity curve (TIC) types were provided using DCE sequences. Results A total of 7 DFSPs, nine dermatofibromas (DF, including four cases of cellular variant [CDF]), 12 keloids, and one nodular fasciitis were enrolled. DFSP showed the largest major diameter and the deepest depth. Five DFSPs (71.4%) showed ill‐defined margins as well as infiltration of peripheral adipose. All DFSPs showed irregular shape. Most DFSPs presented hyperintensity on T2WI (71.4%) and iso‐intensity on T1WI (85.7%). Six cases (85.7%) had significant enhancement, and six cases (85.7%) had homogeneous enhancement. There were significant differences of Ktrans, Kep, Ve and iAUC values among DFSPs, DFs, and keloids, and DFSP had the highest values for these parameters. Six DFSPs (85.7%) and four CDFs (100%) showed type‐III TICs, while the other lesions showed type‐Ⅰor type‐Ⅱ TICs. Conclusions DCE‐HR‐MRI could show the growth characteristics of DFSPs, which was of great value for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of DFSPs and was helpful for the determination of treatment options, thereby to improve the prognosis of patients.