Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review
Do you wish to request the book?
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine in Dermatology: Narrative Review
2025
Overview
Artificial intelligence (AI) and telemedicine have great potential to transform dermatology care delivery, but patient perspectives on these technologies have not been systematically compared.
To examine patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology to inform implementation strategies as these technologies increasingly converge in clinical practice.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases between August 2024 and October 2024. We identified 48 articles addressing patient perspectives on AI and telemedicine in dermatology, with none directly comparing views on both technologies.
Several distinct themes emerged regarding patient perspectives on these technologies: willingness to use, perceived benefits and risks, barriers to implementation, and conditions necessary for successful integration. Findings revealed that patients express hesitancy towards AI-based diagnoses that lack dermatologist involvement, while preferences for teledermatology varied by appointment reason, age, and prior technology exposure. Patients' motivations for AI implementation are connected to AI's potential for quicker diagnoses and improved triage efficiency, while telemedicine addresses logistical challenges such as reduced travel time and improved appointment availability. Both technologies were perceived to improve accessibility and diagnostic efficiency, though patients expressed concerns about AI's limited communication abilities and teledermatology's limits in performing physical examinations. Primary adoption barriers for these modalities included technological limitations and trust concerns, with patients emphasizing the need for dermatologist oversight, transparency, and adequate educational resources for successful integration.
The complementary strengths of AI and teledermatology suggest they could mitigate each other's limitations when integrated-AI potentially enhancing teledermatology's diagnostic accuracy while teledermatology addresses AI's lack of human connection. By thoroughly examining these perspectives, this review may serve as a guide for patient-centered technological integration in the future landscape of accessible dermatologic care.
Publisher
JMIR Publications,JMIR Publications Inc
