Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques
Do you wish to request the book?
Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Mean Performance and Stability in Multi‐Environment Trials I: Combining Features of AMMI and BLUP Techniques
2019
Overview
Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) are popular methods for analyzing multi‐environment trials (MET). The AMMI has nice graphical tools for modeling genotype‐vs.‐environment interaction (GEI) but fails in some aspects, such as accommodating a linear mixed‐effect model (LMM) structure. The BLUP provides reliable estimates but new insights to deal graphically with a random GEI structure are needed. This article compares the predictive success of BLUP and AMMI, shows how to generate biplots for modeling GEI in MET analysis using LMM, and proposes a new quantitative genotypic stability measure called WAASB, which is the Weighted Average of Absolute Scores from the singular value decomposition of the matrix of BLUPs for the GEI effects generated by an LMM. We also introduced the theoretical basis of a superiority index that allows weighting between mean performance and stability, which was conveniently called WAASBY. The BLUP was found to outperform AMMI in the analysis of four real MET trials. The application of our indexes is illustrated using an oat (Avena sativa L.) MET dataset. It was shown that reliable measures of stability using WAASB may help breeders and agronomists to make correct decisions when selecting or recommending genotypes. In addition, the simultaneous selection index, WAASBY, will be useful when the selection should consider different weights for stability and mean performance. Some advantages over existing statistics are discussed. Finally, the implementation of the procedures of this article in future studies is facilitated by an R package containing all required functions. Core Ideas The predictive accuracy of BLUP and AMMI was investigated using four real datasets. BLUP was found to outperform AMMI in all datasets analyzed. A genotypic stability index that inherits the principles of AMMI and BLUP was proposed. A superiority index that allows weighting between mean performance and stability was proposed. An R package with useful functions for MET analysis is presented.
Publisher
The American Society of Agronomy, Inc
Subject
