Journal Article

The role of testimony in mathematics

Sørensen, Henrik Kragh, Andersen, Line Edslev, Andersen, Hanne

2021

Overview

Mathematicians appear to have quite high standards for when they will rely on testimony. Many mathematicians require that a number of experts testify that they have checked the proof of a result p before they will rely on p in their own proofs without checking the proof of p. We examine why this is. We argue that for each expert who testifies that she has checked the proof of p and found no errors, the likelihood that the proof contains no substantial errors increases because different experts will validate the proof in different ways depending on their background knowledge and individual preferences. If this is correct, there is much to be gained for a mathematician from requiring that a number of experts have checked the proof of p before she will rely on p in her own proofs without checking the proof of p. In this way a mathematician can protect her own work and the work of others from errors. Our argument thus provides an explanation for mathematicians’ attitude towards relying on testimony.

• Publisher: Springer Science + Business Media,Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Attitudes / Education / Epistemology / Logic / Mathematicians / Mathematics / Metaphysics / Philosophy / Philosophy of Language / Philosophy of Science / Testimony / VIRTUE THEORY OF MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES