Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes
Do you wish to request the book?
Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Effects of Variable Embryo Transfer on the Variable Window of Implantation and Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes
2024
Overview
Background A descriptive analysis of patients who underwent various embryo transfer methods to address the root cause of their infertility at a tertiary infertility care complex in Wardha, India, is presented herein. This analysis aims to evaluate the management of infertility and assess pregnancy outcomes. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent various embryo transfer methods to address the cause of their infertility, specifically focusing on a variable window of implantation (WOI) at a tertiary infertility clinic over a one-year period. The medical records of 11 patients in both the variable embryo transfer (VET) and control groups were reviewed and analyzed for this article. Results The examination of medical records revealed a significant improvement in the rate of implantation (p-value = 0.04) and clinical pregnancy outcomes (p-value = 0.03) among patients who underwent VET. Comparable statistical outcomes were observed for other variables of pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and biochemical pregnancy rate. Conclusion This retrospective cohort study suggests that the utilization of VET could be a viable option for women experiencing recurrent implantation failure cycles, particularly when an adequate number of embryos are available. This is owing to the challenges in clinically diagnosing a variable WOI. Further studies with a significantly larger sample population are recommended to validate the results and integrate this approach into the standard operating procedures, aiming to enhance the likelihood of pregnancy in these populations.
