Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition
Do you wish to request the book?
The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition
2025
Overview
Previous studies have confirmed stem morphemes (e.g.,
book
) are identified in any position (e.g., in both
bookmark
and
textbook
) but prefixes and suffixes (e.g.,
re
- in
replay
and -
er
in
player
) cannot be recognized when moved from their typical word-initial or word-final locations. However, English words with multiple affixes (e.g.,
unresolved, mindfulness
) suggest there must be further nuance to the positional constraints imposed on affixes in the reading system to facilitate cases where affixes occur in atypical locations but still convey meaning. We used two lexical decision experiments (
N
= 90 native English-speaking participants each) to investigate the positional encoding of mid-embedded suffixes. In Experiment
1
, transposed tri-morphemic nonwords ending in a chain of two suffixes (e.g.,
spitenessful
[derived from
spitefulness
]), and transposed nonwords with string-initial suffixes (e.g.,
fulyouthness
[derived from
youthfulness
]) were compared against orthographic controls (e.g.,
spitementdom
/
domyouthment
). In Experiment
2
, transposed tri-morphemic nonwords ending in a stem (e.g.,
bestersell
[derived from
bestseller
]) and transposed nonwords with string-initial suffixes (e.g.,
erwalksleep
[derived from
sleepwalker
]) were compared against orthographic controls (e.g.,
bestalsell
/
enwalksleep
). Across both experiments, the results revealed a significantly larger morpheme transposition effect relative to controls for the mid-embedded compared with the string-initial suffix conditions. Items like
bestersell
activated the corresponding lexical representation of “bestseller” and made it more difficult to reject the target nonword, revealing that suffixes are not as strictly positionally encoded as previously assumed. These findings challenge existing predictions of positional requirements for affixes and provide evidence calling for more nuanced theoretical models of morphological processing.
Publisher
Springer US
