Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Augmented testing to support manual GUI-based regression testing: An empirical study
by
Bauer, Andreas
, Frattini, Julian
, Alégroth, Emil
in
Augmented Testing
/ Bayesian analysis
/ Bayesian data analysis
/ Compilers
/ Computer Science
/ Context
/ Data analysis
/ Empirical analysis
/ Graphical user interface
/ GUI testing
/ GUI-based testing
/ Interpreters
/ manual teting
/ Programming Languages
/ Regression
/ Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
/ Software testing
/ Systems Engineering
/ Systemteknik
/ Usability
/ User interface
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Augmented testing to support manual GUI-based regression testing: An empirical study
by
Bauer, Andreas
, Frattini, Julian
, Alégroth, Emil
in
Augmented Testing
/ Bayesian analysis
/ Bayesian data analysis
/ Compilers
/ Computer Science
/ Context
/ Data analysis
/ Empirical analysis
/ Graphical user interface
/ GUI testing
/ GUI-based testing
/ Interpreters
/ manual teting
/ Programming Languages
/ Regression
/ Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
/ Software testing
/ Systems Engineering
/ Systemteknik
/ Usability
/ User interface
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Augmented testing to support manual GUI-based regression testing: An empirical study
by
Bauer, Andreas
, Frattini, Julian
, Alégroth, Emil
in
Augmented Testing
/ Bayesian analysis
/ Bayesian data analysis
/ Compilers
/ Computer Science
/ Context
/ Data analysis
/ Empirical analysis
/ Graphical user interface
/ GUI testing
/ GUI-based testing
/ Interpreters
/ manual teting
/ Programming Languages
/ Regression
/ Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
/ Software testing
/ Systems Engineering
/ Systemteknik
/ Usability
/ User interface
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Augmented testing to support manual GUI-based regression testing: An empirical study
Journal Article
Augmented testing to support manual GUI-based regression testing: An empirical study
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Context
Manual graphical user interface (GUI) software testing presents a substantial part of the overall practiced testing efforts, despite various research efforts to further increase test automation. Augmented Testing (AT), a novel approach for GUI testing, aims to aid manual GUI-based testing through a tool-supported approach where an intermediary visual layer is rendered between the system under test (SUT) and the tester, superimposing relevant test information.
Objective
The primary objective of this study is to gather empirical evidence regarding AT’s efficiency compared to manual GUI-based regression testing. Existing studies involving testing approaches under the AT definition primarily focus on exploratory GUI testing, leaving a gap in the context of regression testing. As a secondary objective, we investigate AT’s benefits, drawbacks, and usability issues when deployed with the demonstrator tool, Scout.
Method
We conducted an experiment involving 13 industry professionals, from six companies, comparing AT to manual GUI-based regression testing. These results were complemented by interviews and Bayesian data analysis (BDA) of the study’s quantitative results.
Results
The results of the Bayesian data analysis revealed that the use of AT shortens test durations in 70% of the cases on average, concluding that AT is more efficient. When comparing the means of the total duration to perform all tests, AT reduced the test duration by 36% in total. Participant interviews highlighted nine benefits and eleven drawbacks of AT, while observations revealed four usability issues.
Conclusion
This study presents empirical evidence of improved efficiency using AT in the context of manual GUI-based regression testing. We further report AT’s benefits, drawbacks, and usability issues. The majority of identified usability issues and drawbacks can be attributed to the tool implementation of AT and, thus, can serve as valuable input for future tool development.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.