Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Biological control for grapevine crown gall through soil injection with Allorhizobium vitis strain ARK-1
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Biological control for grapevine crown gall through soil injection with Allorhizobium vitis strain ARK-1
Do you wish to request the book?
Biological control for grapevine crown gall through soil injection with Allorhizobium vitis strain ARK-1
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Biological control for grapevine crown gall through soil injection with Allorhizobium vitis strain ARK-1
2024
Overview
Grapevine crown gall (GCG), caused by tumor-inducing strains of Allorhizobium vitis (= Rhizobium vitis), is a threat to grapevines around the world. Previously, nonpathogenic A. vitis strain ARK-1 emerged as a promising biological control agent, demonstrating remarkable efficacy in root soaking procedures before planting. This study aims to evaluate the treatment effects when applying soil injection procedures post-planting, both in greenhouse and field experiments. The results of the treatment effects obtained from 21 experiments over 9 years (2009 to 2017) were analyzed and evaluated by a general linear mixed model (GLMM) and a network meta-analysis (NMA). The GLMM results revealed a significant association between the factors \"soil injection\" and \"root soaking\" with biological control activity. Subsequently, the NMA results showed that the estimated relative ratio (RR) following root soaking and soil injection treatments with ARK-1 was 0.16 and 0.30, respectively. In summary, while the control efficacy of root soaking with ARK-1 exceeded that of soil injection, the latter method also proved effective in managing GCG. Therefore, soil injection is recommended as a viable approach for GCG control.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
