Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
FIELD COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SLATTED AND GENERAL PURPOSE MOLDBOARD
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
FIELD COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SLATTED AND GENERAL PURPOSE MOLDBOARD
Do you wish to request the book?
FIELD COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SLATTED AND GENERAL PURPOSE MOLDBOARD
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
FIELD COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF SLATTED AND GENERAL PURPOSE MOLDBOARD
2024
Overview
Factorial experiment within randomized complete block design using three replication for field comparison performance slatted and general-purpose moldboard plow. Using least significant design (LSD) 1 % and 5 % was used to compare the mean of treatments. Three factors were used, the first one was depths of tillage 15 and 25 cm, the second was speed of tractor 4.146 and 7.224 km/hr, and the third factor was types of moldboard, slatted and general-purpose moldboard. Slatted moldboard recorded the least slippage of 9.697 %, the fuel consumption of 23.580 L/ha and higher effective field capacity of 0.4239 ha/hr, and field efficiency of 72.543 %. Depth of tillage 15 cm got the least slippage of 6.364 %, fuel consumption of 20.182 L/ha and higher and higher effective field capacity of 0.4402 ha/hr, and field efficiency of 74.187 %. Speed 7.224 km/hr got least fuel consumption 22.939 L/ha and a higher adequate field capacity of 0.5246 ha/hr. Interaction between treatments had a significant effect.
Publisher
Jami'at Baghdad,Baghdad University
