Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Littoral microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) in a prairie coastal wetland: seasonal abundance and community structure
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Littoral microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) in a prairie coastal wetland: seasonal abundance and community structure
Do you wish to request the book?
Littoral microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) in a prairie coastal wetland: seasonal abundance and community structure
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Littoral microcrustaceans (Cladocera, Copepoda) in a prairie coastal wetland: seasonal abundance and community structure
1997
Overview
Seasonal species abundance and community structure of the littoralmicrocrustacean community (Cladocera, Copepoda) in two areas of DeltaMarsh were investigated over the open-water season. Cladoceranabundance in Crescent Pond, with no fish, only invertebrate predatorswas considerably higher than in Blind Channel, with both fish andinvertebrate predators, and where cyclopoid copepods were thedominant microcrustaceans. In both areas, a small number of speciesof planktonic cladocerans characterized the community in spring andearly summer, whereas a diverse array of species of phytophilouscladocerans comprised the community throughout the summer. Daphnia rosea was the most abundant species in the planktoniccommunity in Crescent Pond for the first half of the summer, and Ceriodaphnia dubia was most abundant in the last half. In contrast,no single planktonic cladoceran species was consistently mostabundant in Blind Channel. The sequence of dominant phytophilouscladoceran species observed in Crescent Pond through the season wasChydorus sp. 2, Simocephalus vetulus, Pleuroxusdenticulatus, and Ceriodaphnia dubia, and in Blind Channel,Alona circumfimbriata, Simocephalus vetulus, and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Dominant planktonic and phytophilous copepods inboth areas were Diacyclops thomasi, Acanthocyclops vernalis,Eucyclops agilis, and Macrocyclops albidus. Canonicalcorrespondence analysis revealed differences in community structurebetween areas of the marsh related to turbidity, phytoplanktonbiomass, and soluble reactive phosphorus concentration.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Publisher
Springer,Springer Nature B.V
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.