Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Elections and Decision Making on State High Courts: Examining Legitimacy and Judicial Review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Elections and Decision Making on State High Courts: Examining Legitimacy and Judicial Review
Do you wish to request the book?
Elections and Decision Making on State High Courts: Examining Legitimacy and Judicial Review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Elections and Decision Making on State High Courts: Examining Legitimacy and Judicial Review
2014
Overview
There has long been a debate over how we should select and retain justices on state supreme courts. Many argue that electing the members of these courts challenges the impartiality of the judicial branch. Others highlight that these elected institutions are to be accountable to the public, a condition that is being met. To inform this debate, scholars have long sought to determine if there are significant differences in the composition of, or decision making on these courts. This article continues in that tradition, examining the use of the courts' most important power, judicial review, on elected and appointed courts. I find very few differences in the use of judicial review among courts with different methods of selection and retention.
