Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse
by
Berry, Daniel
, Willoughby, Michael T.
in
Aggressiveness
/ Amalgamation
/ Child development
/ Feedback
/ Inference
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ REVIEW
/ Simulation
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse
by
Berry, Daniel
, Willoughby, Michael T.
in
Aggressiveness
/ Amalgamation
/ Child development
/ Feedback
/ Inference
/ Monte Carlo simulation
/ REVIEW
/ Simulation
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse
Journal Article
On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Reciprocal feedback processes between experience and development are central to contemporary developmental theory. Autoregressive cross-lagged panel (ARCL) models represent a common analytic approach intended to test such dynamics. The authors demonstrate that—despite the ARCL model's intuitive appeal—it typically (a) fails to align with the theoretical processes that it is intended to test and (b) yields estimates that are difficult to interpret meaningfully. Specifically, using a Monte Carlo simulation and two empirical examples concerning the reciprocal relation between spanking and child aggression, it is shown that the cross-lagged estimates derived from the ARCL model reflect a weighted—and typically uninterpretable—amalgam of between- and within-person associations. The authors highlight one readily implemented respecification that better addresses these multiple levels of inference.
Publisher
Wiley for the Society for Research in Child Development,Oxford University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.