Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Compared with Other Instillation Methods in Treating Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Compared with Other Instillation Methods in Treating Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Compared with Other Instillation Methods in Treating Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Compared with Other Instillation Methods in Treating Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024
Overview
Background. In order to prevent the recurrence and progression of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), various bladder instillation therapies have been developed in recent years. Among these, device-assisted Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) has received a great deal of attention. Objective. To identify the efficacy and safety of HIVEC, we conducted this meta-analysis. Methods. We identified relevant articles from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) describing the role of bladder instillation for the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC were involved. Outcomes included 1–3 years Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), 1–3 years Progression-Free Survival (PFS), 5 years Overall Survival (OS), Adverse Events (AEs), and relevant subgroup analyses. Result. Our study involved a total of 10 RCTs and 1360 patients. In subgroup analysis, we found that compared to MMC instillation, HIVEC decreased the 1–3 years RFS (OR = 0.51; p=0.009) while not increasing the incidence of AEs (OR = 0.86; p=0.30). Compared with BCG instillation, HIVEC reduced the incidence of serious AEs (OR = 0.21; p=0.04) while bringing the same efficacy (OR = 0.78; p=0.63). Conclusion. HIVEC combined the advantages of efficacy and safety compared with the two recommended instillation modalities. As a potential alternative therapy, its widespread clinical effect remains to be further evaluated.
Publisher
Hindawi,John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Wiley
