Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Consequentialism and Its Demands: The Role of Institutions
by
Miklós, András
, Tanyi, Attila
in
Coherence
/ Consequentialism
/ Education
/ Epistemology
/ Institutions
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Morality
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Mind
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Consequentialism and Its Demands: The Role of Institutions
by
Miklós, András
, Tanyi, Attila
in
Coherence
/ Consequentialism
/ Education
/ Epistemology
/ Institutions
/ Logic
/ Metaphysics
/ Morality
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Mind
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Consequentialism and Its Demands: The Role of Institutions
Journal Article
Consequentialism and Its Demands: The Role of Institutions
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Consequentialism is often criticized as being overly demanding, and this overdemandingness is seen as sufficient to reject it as a moral theory. This paper takes the plausibility and coherence of this objection—the Demandingness Objection—as a given. Our question, therefore, is how to respond to the Objection. We put forward a response relying on the framework of institutional consequentialism we introduced in previous work. On this view, institutions take over the consequentialist burden, whereas individuals, special occasions aside, are required to set up and maintain institutions. We first describe the Objection, then clarify the theory of institutional consequentialism and show how it responds to the Objection. In the remainder of the paper, we defend the view against potential challenges.
Publisher
Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.