Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery
by
Shi, Yeyin
, Scott, Stephen
, Veeranampalayam Sivakumar, Arun Narenthiran
, J. Jhala, Amit
, Li, Jiating
, Psota, Eric
, Luck, Joe D.
in
algorithms
/ altitude
/ CNN
/ Faster RCNN
/ growing season
/ Inception v2
/ MobileNet v2
/ neural networks
/ patch-based CNN
/ remote sensing
/ seeds
/ soybeans
/ SSD
/ unmanned aerial vehicles
/ weed control
/ weeds
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery
by
Shi, Yeyin
, Scott, Stephen
, Veeranampalayam Sivakumar, Arun Narenthiran
, J. Jhala, Amit
, Li, Jiating
, Psota, Eric
, Luck, Joe D.
in
algorithms
/ altitude
/ CNN
/ Faster RCNN
/ growing season
/ Inception v2
/ MobileNet v2
/ neural networks
/ patch-based CNN
/ remote sensing
/ seeds
/ soybeans
/ SSD
/ unmanned aerial vehicles
/ weed control
/ weeds
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery
by
Shi, Yeyin
, Scott, Stephen
, Veeranampalayam Sivakumar, Arun Narenthiran
, J. Jhala, Amit
, Li, Jiating
, Psota, Eric
, Luck, Joe D.
in
algorithms
/ altitude
/ CNN
/ Faster RCNN
/ growing season
/ Inception v2
/ MobileNet v2
/ neural networks
/ patch-based CNN
/ remote sensing
/ seeds
/ soybeans
/ SSD
/ unmanned aerial vehicles
/ weed control
/ weeds
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery
Journal Article
Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Mid- to late-season weeds that escape from the routine early-season weed management threaten agricultural production by creating a large number of seeds for several future growing seasons. Rapid and accurate detection of weed patches in field is the first step of site-specific weed management. In this study, object detection-based convolutional neural network models were trained and evaluated over low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for mid- to late-season weed detection in soybean fields. The performance of two object detection models, Faster RCNN and the Single Shot Detector (SSD), were evaluated and compared in terms of weed detection performance using mean Intersection over Union (IoU) and inference speed. It was found that the Faster RCNN model with 200 box proposals had similar good weed detection performance to the SSD model in terms of precision, recall, f1 score, and IoU, as well as a similar inference time. The precision, recall, f1 score and IoU were 0.65, 0.68, 0.66 and 0.85 for Faster RCNN with 200 proposals, and 0.66, 0.68, 0.67 and 0.84 for SSD, respectively. However, the optimal confidence threshold of the SSD model was found to be much lower than that of the Faster RCNN model, which indicated that SSD might have lower generalization performance than Faster RCNN for mid- to late-season weed detection in soybean fields using UAV imagery. The performance of the object detection model was also compared with patch-based CNN model. The Faster RCNN model yielded a better weed detection performance than the patch-based CNN with and without overlap. The inference time of Faster RCNN was similar to patch-based CNN without overlap, but significantly less than patch-based CNN with overlap. Hence, Faster RCNN was found to be the best model in terms of weed detection performance and inference time among the different models compared in this study. This work is important in understanding the potential and identifying the algorithms for an on-farm, near real-time weed detection and management.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.