Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method
Do you wish to request the book?
Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method
2008
Overview
A study was conducted to estimate the degree of variability of the airflow resistance in wheat caused by the filling method of grain chambers, compaction of the sample, and airflow direction. Two types of grain chambers were used as follows: a cylindrical column 0.95 m high and 0.196 m in diameter, and a cubical box of 0.35 m side. All factors examined were found to influence considerably the airflow resistance. Gravitational axial filling of the grain column from three heights (0.0, 0.95 and 1.8 m) resulted in the pressure drops of 1.0, 1.3, and 1.5 kPa at the airflow velocity of 0.3 m/s. Consolidation of axially filled samples by vibration resulted in a maximum 2.2 times increase in airflow resistance. The tests with cubical sample showed that in axially filled samples the pressure drop in vertical direction was maximum 1.5 times higher than in horizontal directions. In the case of asymmetrically filled samples, the pressure drop at the airflow velocity of 0.3 m/s in vertical direction Z was found to be 1.3 of that in horizontal direction X and 1.95 times higher than with horizontal direction Y, perpendicular to X. Variations in airflow resistance in values comparable to that found in the present project may be expected in practice.
Publisher
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS),Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Subject
/ AIR FLOW
/ BLE
/ drying
/ EQUIPO
/ GRAIN
/ GRAINE
/ GRANOS
/ Gravity
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_154
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_24098
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_25799
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_2631
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_32808
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_3346
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_6174
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_6946
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_7427
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_7951
/ http://www.fao.org/aos/agrovoc#c_8373
/ MATERIEL
/ PRESION
/ PRESSION
/ PRESSURE
/ SEEDS
/ SEMILLA
/ STOCKAGE
/ STORAGE
/ TRIGO
/ VELOCITY
/ VITESSE
/ Wheat
/ WHEATS
