Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Study on Full-Scale Pore Structure Characterization and Gas Adsorption Capacity of Shale and Coal Reservoirs
by
Yu, Xinan
, Wang, Bo
, Tang, Wei
, Deng, Ze
, Yu, Maonan
, Yang, Jianghai
, Wang, Tao
, Ouyang, Mukun
, You, Chunli
in
Adsorption
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Coal
/ Coalbed methane
/ Comparative studies
/ Experimental methods
/ Experiments
/ Fractures
/ Gas flow
/ Geology
/ Industrial gases
/ Integrated approach
/ Low pressure
/ Low temperature
/ Methane
/ Microfracture
/ Natural gas
/ Natural gas reserves
/ Organic carbon
/ Organic matter
/ Petroleum mining
/ Pore size
/ Pores
/ Research methodology
/ Reservoirs
/ Scanning electron microscopy
/ Shale
/ Shale gas
/ Structural analysis
/ Total organic carbon
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Study on Full-Scale Pore Structure Characterization and Gas Adsorption Capacity of Shale and Coal Reservoirs
by
Yu, Xinan
, Wang, Bo
, Tang, Wei
, Deng, Ze
, Yu, Maonan
, Yang, Jianghai
, Wang, Tao
, Ouyang, Mukun
, You, Chunli
in
Adsorption
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Coal
/ Coalbed methane
/ Comparative studies
/ Experimental methods
/ Experiments
/ Fractures
/ Gas flow
/ Geology
/ Industrial gases
/ Integrated approach
/ Low pressure
/ Low temperature
/ Methane
/ Microfracture
/ Natural gas
/ Natural gas reserves
/ Organic carbon
/ Organic matter
/ Petroleum mining
/ Pore size
/ Pores
/ Research methodology
/ Reservoirs
/ Scanning electron microscopy
/ Shale
/ Shale gas
/ Structural analysis
/ Total organic carbon
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Study on Full-Scale Pore Structure Characterization and Gas Adsorption Capacity of Shale and Coal Reservoirs
by
Yu, Xinan
, Wang, Bo
, Tang, Wei
, Deng, Ze
, Yu, Maonan
, Yang, Jianghai
, Wang, Tao
, Ouyang, Mukun
, You, Chunli
in
Adsorption
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Coal
/ Coalbed methane
/ Comparative studies
/ Experimental methods
/ Experiments
/ Fractures
/ Gas flow
/ Geology
/ Industrial gases
/ Integrated approach
/ Low pressure
/ Low temperature
/ Methane
/ Microfracture
/ Natural gas
/ Natural gas reserves
/ Organic carbon
/ Organic matter
/ Petroleum mining
/ Pore size
/ Pores
/ Research methodology
/ Reservoirs
/ Scanning electron microscopy
/ Shale
/ Shale gas
/ Structural analysis
/ Total organic carbon
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparative Study on Full-Scale Pore Structure Characterization and Gas Adsorption Capacity of Shale and Coal Reservoirs
Journal Article
Comparative Study on Full-Scale Pore Structure Characterization and Gas Adsorption Capacity of Shale and Coal Reservoirs
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Shale and coal in the transitional marine–continental facies of the Ordos Basin serve as unconventional natural gas reservoirs, with their pore structures controlling gas adsorption characteristics and occurrence states. To quantitatively characterize the pore structure features and differences between these two reservoirs, this study takes the Shanxi Formation shale and coal in the Daning–Jixian area on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin as examples. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), high-pressure mercury intrusion, low-temperature N2 adsorption, and low-pressure CO2 adsorption experiments were employed to analyze and compare the full-scale pore structures of the shale and coal reservoirs. Combined with methane isothermal adsorption experiments, the gas adsorption capacity and its differences in these reservoirs were investigated. The results indicate that the average total organic carbon (TOC) content of shale is 2.66%, with well-developed organic pores, inorganic pores, and microfractures. Organic pores are the most common, typically occurring densely and in clusters. The average TOC content of coal is 74.22%, with organic gas pores being the dominant pore type, significantly larger in diameter than those in transitional marine–continental facies shale and marine shale. In coal, micropores contribute the most to pore volume, while mesopores and macropores contribute less. In shale, mesopores dominate, followed by micropores, with macropores being underdeveloped. Both coal and shale exhibit a high SSA primarily contributed by micropores, with organic matter serving as the material basis for micropore development. The methane adsorption capacity of coal is 8–29 times higher than that of shale. Coal contains abundant organic micropores, providing a large SSA and numerous adsorption sites for methane, facilitating gas adsorption and storage. This study comprehensively reveals the similarities and differences in pore structures between transitional marine–continental facies shale and coal reservoirs in the Ordos Basin at the microscale, providing a scientific basis for the precise evaluation and development of unconventional oil and gas resources.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.